This course is the first in a series of three courses related to the design project. This course emphasizes project management and teamwork. Students form groups of 4 or 5 students to propose a design project. Student groups prepare a short presentation on their design project proposal. Students also critique design project proposals.
Links | Contacts | Inventory | Schedule | Deliverables | Grading | Material | Team | Topic | Resources | Funding | Archives | Revisions| Yellow Book | ECE 391 |
| Discussion Forum | UW ACE |
| Coordinator | Bill Bishop | x37159 | EIT 4101 |
| Instructor | Andrew Morton | x35027 | DC 2597C |
| Lab Instructor | Ed Spike | x33716 | E2 3357 |
| Lab Director | Roger Sanderson | x36184 | E2 2355 |
| Systems Support | Paul Ludwig | x32847 | EIT 4024 |
To access the ECE Project Inventory Website, click here.
| Class | Instructor | Lecture Times | Room |
| Seminar 001 | Andrew Morton | 12:30-1:20 MWF | RCH 110 |
The course website for ECE 391 is not updated regularly. Please refer to UW ACE for the most recent course materials.
| Term | Deliverable | Comments | Scheme | Code | Submission | Due | Marker | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3B | ECE 391 | 0.25 credit | Fall | ||||||
| Class of 2011 | CR/NOCR/INC | 2009 | |||||||
| Abstract | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | AB | UW ACE | Oct 9 | Instructor | ||||
| Project Agreement | Submit a signed hardcopy to the FYDP Coordinator | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | PA | EIT 4101 | Oct 16 | Coordinator | |||
| Proposal Presentation Signup | EIT 4101 | Oct 26 - Oct 30 | Coordinator | ||||||
| Project Specification | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | PS | UW ACE | Nov 6 | Instructor | ||||
| Proposal Presentation | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | PP | RCH 309 | Nov 16 - Nov 30 | Instructor / Peers | ||||
| Proposal Critiques | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | PC | RCH 309 | Nov 16 - Nov 30 | Instructor | ||||
| Distant Proposal Critiques | Exchange students | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | DPC | Nov 30 | Instructor | ||||
|
1. Copy the Distant Proposal Critique (DPC) form 2. Complete the form for each of DPC1 and DPC2 3. Email the result to the Instructor before the deadline | |||||||||
| Proposal Presentation Slides | Pass/Resubmit/Fail | PO | UW ACE | Nov 30 | Instructor | ||||
| Safety Lecture | Mandatory Attendance | SL | RCH 110 | TBA | Lab Instructor | ||||
| Project Specification (PS) |
The Project Specification must provide sufficient detail for you
to plan the subsequent ECE 492A design phase. It provides:
You will need to apply some judgement in deciding what details are required to fulfill these planning roles. The supplied example shows the format we require for communicating the information, and the level of detail we expect for the example application. |
| Course exemptions |
The ECE 391/492A/B series are core compulsory courses
for the undergraduate electrical engineering and computer
engineering programs.
The following may earn a student an exemption from the ECE 391/492A/B course series:
Issuance of any exemption from the ECE 391/492A/B course series is subject to approval by the Department's undergraduate officers in consultation with the Design Project Coordinator and the Engineering Exchange Program Director, or their designate. Students anticipating the need for an exemption should notify the Design Project Coordinator as soon as possible, and make the necessary arrangements during their last on-campus term, before departing for their exchange terms. Students who will be away for only ECE 391 are advised to select a student team and topic before they leave, and complete ECE 391 from a distance. These students can complete the ECE 492A and ECE 492B on campus when they return. (See Team, outlined below.) |
| Lecture slides | MS PowerPoint Slides | |
| Reference books |
Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers, J. Eric Salt and Robert Rothery, © 2002 John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0-471-39146-8 $46.95 UW Bookstore |
|
| Supplementary books |
Engineering Design, Clive Dym, Patrick Little © 2004, second edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., ISBN 0-471-25687-0 |
Harvey Mudd College's E4 course |
|
Tools and Tactics of Design, Dominick, Lawbaugh, Fromm, Demel, Freuler, Kinzel © 2001, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., ISBN 0-471-38648-0 |
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition | |
|
Crossing the Chasm, Geoffrey Moore, © 1991, revised edition 1999, Harper Collins, ISBN 0066620023 $20.76 Amazon.ca |
Technology marketing |
| Student team |
The student project team must meet the following constraints.
|
|||||||||||
| Mixed-stream teams |
Teams can include any combination of members from
between opposite streams, i.e., 4-stream and 8-stream.
If a student's team does not present until Winter, the
student's ECE 391 grade is simply deferred until the
team completes the Proposal Presentation successfully
in the Winter, as outlined in the table shown below.
|
|||||||||||
| Distant students |
Students enrolled in ECE 391 from a distance (e.g., on
exchange) fulfill the ECE 391 course requirements as
follows:
|
|||||||||||
| Distant student enrollment, fees and credits |
Per-course fees cost over $700. To avoid incurring this
fee for a single course (e.g., ECE 391) the course
instructors will often enroll distant students in the
course during a full-load term, even though this may be
a different term from when the student actually earns
the credit.
For example, Stewart is away on exchange in the Fall and Winter. He paid his UW tuition fees for both terms before he left. The course instructors enrolled Stewart in ECE 391 during the Fall. However, he is working with a group of Winter-stream students. Consequently, his Fall transcript shows INC for ECE 391. When he and his teammates complete the ECE 391 requirements in March, the course instructors will convert his INC to CR. |
|||||||||||
| Consultant |
The project consultant must meet the following constraints:
|
|||||||||||
The project topic must meet the following constraints:
|
| Costs |
|
| Financial and material resources |
|
| Educational discounts |
|
| Ad hoc sponsors |
|
| Standing sponsors |
|
| Local vendors |
|
| Lab facilities |
|
| Machine shop |
|
| Patent protection |
|
| Commercialization |
|
| Principles |
The Student Project Fund (SPF) has been established by the ECE Department to offset a portion of the cost of purchasing equipment used by students in the completion of their design projects. The remaining cost of a student design project should be split among all members of the design project group in a fair and equitable manner. SPF money is allocated by a committee of peers. Reasonable requests for equipment purchases will likely be supported by the committee. Unreasonable requests will likely be denied. The criteria and procedures for obtaining SPF funding aim to maximize the benefit realized by the funds. |
| Authority |
The authority for allocating SPF funds to project teams rests with the SPF Committee, which forms and meets during each term that ECE 391 is offered. The SPF Commitee comprises the following members:
Decisions are reached by majority vote. Each class gets one vote, except the class enrolled in ECE 391, which does not vote. The Coordinator chairs the meeting and only votes when necessary to break a tie. The Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Committee reaches decisions that are consistent with University policy, and with the principles and criteria listed here. |
| Ownership |
All materials purchased, in whole or in part, using SPF funds are the property of the University of Waterloo, regardless of whether other monies are applied towards the same purchase. After completion of the ECE 492B Symposium, material purchased using SPF funds enter the ECE Inventory for use by future students. Such material are not for use by project consultants, professors or University research groups. |
| Reimbursement only |
The SPF operates strictly on a reimbursement basis in exchange for returned material. Student teams purchase any material using their own money. The SPF fund only reimburses the students after they return the purchased material following the completion of the Symposium in 4B, up to the limit approved from their funding request, and only for the material for which the approval was originally issued. In no case will the SPF provide funds without obtaining the corresponding material for deposit into the ECE Inventory. |
| Requests |
Student project teams seeking SPF support submit their requests as part of the project documentation prepared during ECE 391. The requests must:
The ECE 391 course instructors may supply a template for the teams to use in preparing their funding requests. The template includes the requirements listed above. Requests which do not follow the template may be rejected due to incomplete information or unclear presentation. Requests that follow the template and provide complete and concise information are more likely to realize a favourable decision. |
| Criteria |
Only funding requests that satisfy the criteria listed below may be granted support from the Student Project Fund. However, satisfying these criteria does not assure support, as specific funding levels depend on supply and demand during each term. |
| Durable material |
SPF funds may only be used to purchase durable material, and to cover reasonable costs incurred in obtaining or fabricating such material. Typical permitted uses include components, printed circuit boards, development kits, mechanical casings and related hardware. SPF funds can be used to pay for shipping and brokerage fees involved in obtaining material. |
| Exclusions |
SPF funds cannot be used for purchasing service agreements or intellectual property such as wireless air time, telephone charges, software licenses, books, or journals. Similarly, the costs of printing reports, binding reports, and printing posters are the responsibility of the student group members. SPF funds may only be used to purchase equipment that may be placed into the design project inventory and used in subsequent terms. |
| Other sources |
SPF funds can only be used to purchase material that cannot otherwise be reasonably acquired or borrowed from other sources. Other sources to consider include:
|
| Good value |
Purchases made with SPF funds must represent good value, such that material are obtained at competitive prices from reputable vendors. |
| Typical support |
About half of the project teams in any given class request SPF support. Of those, the vast majority of teams request no more than a few hundred dollars. One or two teams per term typically request amounts approaching or exceeding one thousand dollars. The Committee has never approved a request larger than eighteen hundred dollars. Most requests receive some support. Support levels for specific teams are often reduced from the submitted request, being adjusted according to the SPF Committee's assessment of the request's justification and the availability of material from other sources. |